Springfield Armory's&...
Springfield Armory's&...
Handloading... A Sort...
Either a 338 Ultra Ma...
Scoping the K31
Remington's Model...
Ten to Win! - Con...
Remington's Model...
The Swiss K31 Par...
The Swiss K31 Par...
Tokarev TT-C Part...
Tokarev TT-C Part...
ZiP™ - It's the F...
Winchester's XPR ...
17 Hornet
204 Ruger
22 Hornet
22-250 Remington
220 Swift
223 Remington
243 Winchester
6mm Remington
240 Weatherby
25-20 WCF
257 Roberts
25-06 Remington
257 WM
6.5 Creedmoor
6.5x55mm Swede
260 Remington
6.5-284 Norma
264 Winchester Mag
6.8 Rem SPC
270 Winchester
270 WSM
270 Weatherby
7mm-30 RG
7mm-08 Remington
7x57 Mauser
280 Remington
7mm Remington Mag
7mm WSM
7mm Rem Ultra Mag
30-30 WCF
30 Remington AR
7.5x55 Swiss
308 Winchester
30-06 Springfield
300 RCM
300 WSM
300 Winchester Mag
300 Weatherby Mag
300 Ultra Mag
7.62x39mm Russian
7.62x54R Russian
303 British
8x57mm Mauser
325 WSM
8x56R Mannlicher
338 Marlin Express
338 RCM
338 Remington UM
338 Winchester Mag
340 Weatherby Mag
338-378 WM
348 Winchester
358-378 RG
375 H&H
375 Ruger
375 Remington UM
378 Weatherby Mag
38-55 WCF
450/400 3" NE
416 WM
416 Ruger
416 Rigby
.44-40 W.C.F.
44 Rem Mag - Rifle
45 Colt
454 Casull Rifle
45-70 Government
45-70 Cast
450 Marlin
450 Rigby
460 Weatherby
500 S&W
500 Jeffrey


Remington's Model 783
Never assume
©RGI Media, Inc - Published with permission

We live in a tragic world of public misinformation these days that could easily be remedied by removing the "Comments" feature from technical articles. I was reading prerelease coverage of the Remington Model 783 a while ago. The coverage was well thought out, experienced technical insight was provided and the author obviously has access to Remington management. Very well done, very educational. What followed in the "comments" section was the typical train wreck of public opinion.

Perhaps a dozen people led with comments regarding content of the article and assessments of facts and illustrations presented. For the most part positive, but also taking exception to specific points that they carefully and logically defined. Most seemed to understand that this Model 783 is a firearm positioned to satisfy a growing demand for low cost, no frills firearms and perhaps as a phased in replacement for the Model 770 product. Unfortunately, the divot heads then arrived.

One guy claimed to have owned and sold, out of dissatisfaction, this new model. Not sure how, as the first production inventory did not move into resale channels until almost two weeks after the post was made. Two guys stated that the new model is based on the Remington Model 770, then went on to list all of the things they felt was wrong with the Model 770. The Model 783 is not a Model 770 derivative and even the technical comments regarding the Model 770 were grossly incorrect. Some folks trashed Remington for producing an inexpensive rifle which, they felt, somehow besmirched the reputation of the Remington Model 700, then went on to promote Savage, a low cost firearm company infamous for placing cost reduction before aesthetics and quality. Others just blurted out the name of their favorite handgun... or dog, or car, or home state.

 Made in Kentucky... Yes, that is the U.S.A

The Remington Model 783 is manufactured in the Remington Mayfield, Kentucky plant where Remington expand from 44,000 square feet to 91,000 square feet and to bump employment from 91 to 315 people. The intention is to accommodate Model 783 production as well as several Marlin product lines. Not sure how anyone can grumble over "Made in America". Millions invested in America and the creation of American jobs. Wonder how many thousands of jobs New York State's politics have costs the residents of that state?

A port without a storm

The Model 783 is a Remington type thick wall, cylindrical receiver with a minimal port opening for the sake of receiver rigidity. The receiver is all steel with no poly inserts as is the case with the Model 770. The Model 783 receiver top measures a robust 0.345" compared to a Model 700 receiver which measures 0.215". Bolt lug seats are integral to the receiver, just like the Remington Model 700, not in the barrel shank as is the case with the Model 770. The tang is an extension of the receiver on both the Model 783 and Model 700, not an additional piece as it is on the Model 770.

During the evaluation of the Model 783, there was no incidence of empty brass not ejecting as a result of the reduced ejection port size. During live fire evaluation I top loaded the staggered magazine and routinely dropped a round into the chamber without mishap or hardship. The Model 700 aft receiver is flat contoured like a Mauser. The Model 783 maintains a 1.360" diameter front to rear. Because the receiver isn't stepped, it utilizes symmetrical scope bases from and rear; two Model 700 front bases.

Both the Model 700 and Model 783 have barrels with threaded shanks and a sandwiched recoil lug. However, where headspace for the Model 700 is controlled with depth of chamber reamer cut, the Model 783 has a degree of headspace adjustment provided my the barrel nut positioning.

I still don't like Michael Bolton

Both the Model 700 (lower) and Model 783 share a common bolt body diameter of 0.695" and opposing twin lugs for a 90º lift and approximately 4.500" stroke. That is enough cartridge length capacity to handle a Remington Ultra Mag.

A notable physical difference is that the bolt body and face extend beyond the Model 700's lugs to recess into the rifle's barrel shank when the bolt is closed; Remington's three rings of steel. The Model 783 does not share this feature. The Model 783 also has a sliding rather than fixed extractor.

The Model 783 has a magnum profile 22" long barrel with a 10" button rifles twist. Nothing is lightweight or delicate on this firearms, which probably explains the 7.5 lb weight for the 30-06 Springfield version.

The stock... bad image to follow

The stock is secured to the barreled action with two graded, internal hex head fasteners. Removal is easy, and necessary when adjusting the Model 783's trigger.

I think there is enough clarity in the image above to illustrate the two pillar bedding inserts molded integral to the stock and the strengthening ribs in the barrel channel. The Model 783 does not use an integrated aluminum frame and the barrel is full floating. From experience with Remington and other manufacturers products with similar stocks, the result is usually consistent accuracy and recoil dampening and I saw nothing different in the Model 783.

The magazine is a staggered type. The base is poly, the rest is steel, including magazine box and follower. I was able to load 4 rounds of 30-06 Springfield and one in the chamber for a total capacity of 5. The magazine type allows easy top loading is desired, however, the simple one catch release... sounds like fishing... makes the magazine easy to load when removed from the rifle.

Where the Model 700 gets the X-Mark Pro trigger, the Model 783 gets the sear presetting CrossFire trigger. The little spur hinged in the trigger face acts as a safety to prevent a very light trigger from firing without finger tip depression. Pull is adjustable from 2.5 - 5 lbs by cranking the nut locked set screw in the front face of the trigger housing.

Hmmm... so wadda we have?

Remington Model 783



Item #



Bolt Action


30-06 Springfield

Mag Capacity


Barrel Length





7.5 Lbs

Overall Length

41 5/8"




Matte Blued Steel

Length of Pull

13 1/2"

Drop at comb


Drop at heel





Drilled and Tapped

Trigger Pull

Adjustable 2.5 - 5.0 Lbs


Thumb 2 Position



Nominal Weights & Measures


Mostly a rifle we need to take a careful look at and not draw associations with other Remington models or other brand rifles. Today this is a basic model Remington, but only because of finish, not design. Much like the Model 700 SPS compared to the Model 700 CDL in price, fit and finish.

Polish the hardware a bit, finish the barreled action with satin bluing, drop it into a cut checked walnut stock and you've got a very nice sporter. Substitute a heavy contour, precision barrel and you've got a good varmint or perhaps target rifle. My point is that the Model 783 appears to be more of a starting point of a successor to the Model 700 than a limited application product like the Model  770. No, I have no insight into that issue, nor am I speaking with any greater authority that conjecture affords.

Because the receiver is non-stepped cylindrical, both front and rear scope mount bases are the same. I mentioned two from Remington Model 700 bases, which is a common Warne M902, the same front base used on the Remington Model 700, the Weatherby Vanguard and Mark V, the Howa 1500, the Winchester Model 70, etc.  For now, we're going to do a little more shooting to make sure we have a good feel for the rifle, it's handling characteristics and its accuracy.

Remington Model 783 Part I
Remington Model 783 Part II

Come Visit the RealGunsStore.com!

7.62x25mm Tokarev
327 Federal Mag
357 SIG
357 Magnum
40 S&W
41 Remington Mag
44 Mag Revolver
45 ACP
45 Colt
45 Super
460 Rowland
454 Casull
7.62 Nagant
9mm Luger
9mm Luger +P
10mm Auto
17-357 RG
222 Remington
223 Remington
30-30 WCF
44 Magnum
45-70 Government
General Info
Powder Rates
Primer Table
Safety Tips
Site Disclaimer
    All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. © 2015 Real Guns, Inc.